What Tax Implications Should I Know Before Creating a Group Structure?
- Claire Hancott
- 2 days ago
- 9 min read

If you're a 7-figure business owner considering acquiring another business, opening additional locations, or inheriting a company, you're about to enter group structure territory—and the hidden tax implications could cost you £50,000+ annually if you're not prepared.
Here's what you need to know: Once you own multiple connected companies, you lose access to critical tax reliefs that smaller businesses take for granted—business rate relief, the employment allowance, VAT flat rate schemes, and favourable corporation tax thresholds. These aren't minor adjustments; they're cliff-edge changes that can fundamentally alter whether an acquisition makes financial sense or devastates your cash flow.
Let's break down exactly what happens to your tax position when you move from a single company to a group structure—and how to plan for it with your proactive accountant before you're caught off-guard.
Understanding "Connected" vs "Associated" Companies
Before diving into specific taxes, understand this critical concept: The UK tax system treats multiple companies under common ownership very differently from standalone businesses—but frustratingly, different taxes use different terminology and rules.
The general principle: If you (or a group of people) control more than 51% of multiple businesses, those businesses are typically connected for tax purposes. "Control" means:
You own 51%+ shares in multiple companies
You and your spouse/partner collectively own 51%+ in multiple companies
You and business partners who also control another company together
The two-company loophole: With only two companies, you can sometimes structure ownership to avoid connection. For example, if you own 51% of Company A and 49% of Company B (with your spouse owning 49% of A and 51% of B), they may not be treated as connected for some tax purposes.
Beyond two companies, you're trapped. There's no clean way to avoid connected company status when you own three or more entities—and that's when the tax bill starts climbing.
Hidden Tax #1: Business Rate Relief (The Property Expansion Trap)
What it is: Small businesses in the UK with rateable property values under approximately £15,000 pay zero business rates. Those with rateable values between £15,000-£51,000 receive tapered relief, potentially saving thousands annually.
The group structure problem: Once you expand to multiple locations—even under separate limited companies—you lose business rate relief across all properties.
The 12-month grace period: You get one year of relief continuation on your original property after expanding. After that, full business rates kick in across your entire property portfolio.
Real-world impact: If you're running a profitable operation from a small office paying zero business rates, and you acquire another business with its own premises, you could suddenly face a £10,000-15,000 annual rates bill across both locations. Your management accounts just took a significant hit—and you need to factor that into your acquisition pricing.
The "financial independence" test: HMRC looks beyond just company structure. If your businesses share customers, resources, or financial dependency, they may treat them as connected even if technically separate. This isn't a loophole you can easily exploit with creative company structures.
Hidden Tax #2: Employment Allowance (The Payroll Cliff)
What it is: Businesses can currently claim £10,500 annually against their employer's National Insurance bill—the "employment allowance." For businesses with modest payrolls, this can eliminate NI liability entirely.
The group structure problem: You only get one employment allowance across all connected companies, regardless of how many employees each business has.
Real-world scenario: Company A has 5 employees generating £8,000 in employer NI liability (fully covered by employment allowance). Company B has 3 employees generating £5,000 in employer NI.
Before acquisition: Total NI cost = £0 (both companies claim their allowance independently)
After acquisition: Total NI cost = £2,500 (combined £13,000 liability, minus one £10,500 allowance)
You've just added £2,500+ to your annual costs simply by connecting the companies. Your profit and loss statement needs to account for this ongoing expense.
Control determines connection: This rule triggers based on director/shareholder control. If the same people control both businesses (even if there's no formal holding company structure), you're limited to one allowance.
Hidden Tax #3: VAT Flat Rate Scheme (The Silent Profit Killer)
What it is: Small businesses under certain turnover thresholds can use the VAT flat rate scheme, charging customers 20% VAT but only remitting a lower percentage to HMRC (typically 10-14.5% depending on sector). The difference is essentially a profit boost.
The eligibility criteria:
Can join when turnover is below ~£160,000
Must leave when turnover exceeds ~£230,000
Cannot use if eligible to join a VAT group
The devastating rule: If you have connected companies, you're eligible to join a VAT group (even if you choose not to). That eligibility alone disqualifies you from the flat rate scheme.
Real-world tragedy: One business owner inherited his father's company after his father's death. His existing business was on the flat rate scheme, paying over 10% to HMRC while charging customers 20%—effectively a 10% profit margin boost.
The instant he inherited the second company, he became eligible for a VAT group. His flat rate scheme eligibility vanished. That 10% boost disappeared overnight—and for a business with modest margins, that 10% represented a significant portion of total profit.
When VAT groups actually help:
Frequent refund scenarios: If one entity regularly gets VAT refunds (e.g., heavy capital investment periods) while another pays VAT, a VAT group lets you offset them, improving cash flow.
Heavy inter-company trading: If your companies regularly trade with each other, a VAT group eliminates VAT on those internal transactions, reducing administrative burden and improving working capital.
For most 7-figure businesses, these benefits rarely outweigh losing the flat rate scheme if you qualify for it. Your accountant should model both scenarios in your management accounts before you make acquisition decisions.
Hidden Tax #4: Corporation Tax Associated Companies Rule (The Big One)
This is where group structures can cost you serious money—and where many business owners get blindsided.
The current UK corporation tax structure:
Profits under £50,000: 19% tax rate
Profits over £250,000: 25% tax rate
Profits between £50,000-£250,000: Tapered rate (typically ~23-24%)
The associated companies problem: When calculating these thresholds, HMRC combines the profits of all associated companies under common control.
Real-world impact:
Scenario 1: Single Company
Company profit: £180,000
Corporation tax rate: ~23.5%
Tax bill: ~£42,300
Scenario 2: After acquiring second company making £100,000 profit
Combined profit: £280,000
Corporation tax rate: 25% (both companies now in top bracket)
Tax bill: £70,000
You've just increased your effective tax rate by triggering the £250,000 combined threshold. The acquisition itself may be profitable, but the tax structure changed across your entire group.
The cash flow nightmare—Large Company Scheme: If your combined profits exceed £1.5 million, you're moved from the "small company" corporation tax payment scheme to the "large company" scheme.
Small company scheme: Pay corporation tax 9 months after your year-end as a lump sum.
Large company scheme: Pay quarterly instalments during your accounting year.
Cash flow impact: A business with £1.5 million profit faces a ~£375,000 annual corporation tax bill. Under the small scheme, you have 9+ months after year-end to prepare that payment. Under the large scheme, you're paying quarterly instalments—effectively bringing that tax bill forward by 12-18 months.
If your cash flow planning doesn't account for this shift, you could face serious working capital constraints. Your finance director or finance manager needs to model this in your forecasts before you cross that threshold.
The "Control" Game: Can You Structure Around It?
The frustrating answer: Rarely, and not sustainably.
The two-company trick works (sometimes): If you're a married couple or partnership, you can potentially structure two companies with split control (you own 51% of A, partner owns 51% of B) to maintain separate tax treatment.
Three or more companies? You're stuck. There's no clean ownership structure that avoids associated/connected status once you own three+ companies and actually control them.
Why creative structures fail:
Financial dependency tests: If companies share customers, resources, management, or cash flow, HMRC can deem them connected regardless of share structure.
Substance over form: Bringing in a third-party shareholder with 50% ownership to break control only works if they genuinely control the business. If you're effectively running everything, HMRC sees through it.
Personal guarantee implications: Even if you break direct ownership control, you'll likely need to guarantee any business loans or property leases—which creates liability you were trying to avoid.
The lesson: Don't build acquisition strategies around clever tax structures. Build them around genuine business growth economics, then optimise tax within the rules. Your proactive accountant should help you understand the real cost, not sell you on dubious schemes.
Due Diligence: The Critical Questions Before Acquisition
If you're acquiring a business or opening additional entities, your accountant must address these questions before you finalise the deal:
Business rates analysis:
What business rate relief does the target company currently claim?
What rates will you pay across all properties post-acquisition?
Does your acquisition pricing account for this additional cost?
Employment allowance assessment:
What's the combined employer NI liability across all entities?
How much will you lose by consolidating to one employment allowance?
Is this factored into your cash flow projections?
VAT structure review:
Is the target (or your existing business) using flat rate scheme?
What's the profit impact of losing that scheme?
Would a VAT group structure actually benefit your inter-company trading patterns?
Corporation tax modeling:
What are combined profits across all entities?
Will you trigger the £50k, £250k, or £1.5M thresholds?
How does the effective tax rate change impact your deal economics?
Do you need to prepare for quarterly corporation tax installments?
The £50k dent: Lose business rate relief, employment allowance, and shift corporation tax brackets simultaneously? You could easily see £50,000+ in additional annual tax costs that weren't in your initial projections.
For a business operating on 15-20% profit margins, that's equivalent to losing £250,000-350,000 in revenue. The acquisition better deliver serious synergies to justify that hit.
Strategic Planning: How 7-Figure Business Owners Should Approach Groups
1. Model the full cost in your management accounts
Before acquiring, don't just analyze the target's standalone profit and loss. Model the combined entity's tax position, including:
Lost reliefs across all companies
New tax thresholds triggered
Cash flow impact of changing payment schemes
Administrative costs of running multiple entities
2. Consider holding company structures thoughtfully
A holding company structure (HoldCo owning multiple operating subsidiaries) doesn't avoid most of these rules—they're still associated companies. But it can:
Simplify share purchase agreements in future acquisitions
Create cleaner asset protection
Enable more tax-efficient profit extraction strategies (if structured correctly with your accountant)
Don't assume a holding company structure solves tax problems. It usually doesn't.
3. Price acquisitions with eyes wide open
If an acquisition triggers £30-50k in annual additional tax costs, that's not just a one-year hit—it's perpetual. The target's valuation should reflect this reality. A business making £100k profit that costs you £30k in lost reliefs is really only delivering £70k annually to your group.
4. Time your acquisitions strategically
If you're close to the £1.5M profit threshold, consider:
Delaying acquisitions until after year-end to avoid triggering quarterly tax installments mid-year
Structuring acquisition timing around your cash flow cycles
Modelling whether deferring growth one year saves more in tax timing than it costs in lost opportunity
5. Work with a finance director-level advisor
Bookkeeping and compliance-focused accountants often miss these strategic considerations. You need someone who:
Reviews management accounts through a strategic lens
Models acquisition impacts before you sign terms
Helps structure deals to minimise tax cliffs
Plans cash flow for changing tax payment schemes
This is finance director-level work, not bookkeeping.
When Group Structures Still Make Sense
Despite these tax implications, group structures often remain the right choice when:
1. Acquisition delivers strong operational synergies If buying the business generates £200k in additional profit through cost savings, shared resources, or revenue growth, paying £40k more in tax is worth it.
2. Strategic portfolio building Serial acquirers building portfolios accept higher tax costs as the price of business growth. The goal isn't to avoid tax—it's to build enterprise value that outweighs incremental costs.
3. Risk mitigation justifies the cost Holding property or high-liability operations in separate entities may justify tax costs through asset protection benefits.
4. Your profits already exceed the thresholds If you're already above £250k profit and paying 25% corporation tax, adding another profitable business doesn't change your rate—it just adds more profit to tax at the same rate.
The key is knowing the cost before you commit, not discovering it in your year-end accounts when your accountant delivers bad news.
The Bottom Line: Plan Before You Expand
Group structures aren't inherently good or bad—they're tools with costs and benefits. The problem arises when business owners focus solely on operational synergies and ignore the tax structure implications.
£50,000 in unexpected annual tax costs can turn a profitable acquisition into a break-even drag. It can make expanding to a second location financially unviable. It can derail your cash flow if you're suddenly paying quarterly tax instalments without preparation.
The solution isn't avoiding growth—it's planning for it intelligently. Before you sign that acquisition agreement or lease a second premises:
Have your proactive accountant model the full tax impact
Update your management accounts to reflect the true post-acquisition cost structure
Adjust your valuation and deal terms accordingly
Prepare your cash flow forecasts for changing tax payment schedules
Document the decision with full awareness of the trade-offs
The businesses that successfully scale through acquisitions aren't the ones avoiding these taxes (you can't)—they're the ones who price them into their decisions from day one and structure deals that deliver returns after accounting for the real costs.
Considering an acquisition or expansion that might create a group structure? Don't wait until after the deal closes to understand the tax implications. Work with a finance director-level advisor who can model the full financial impact on your profit and loss, cash flow, and business growth strategy.
Need strategic guidance on M&A tax planning and group structure optimisation? Visit profitcashgrowth.com to learn how we help 7-figure business owners make acquisition decisions with complete financial clarity—not expensive surprises.




Comments